<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>The place João Bordalo calls home: Tag chrome</title>
    <link>http://www.joaobordalo.com/articles_controller.rb/tag?tag=chrome</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Simplicity, Usability, Productivity, Code, Design, Business and more</description>
    <item>
      <title>Chrome, some bad news</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt; Google's &lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/update-to-google-chromes-terms-of.html"&gt;has changed&lt;/a&gt; the Terms of Service for Chrome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everyone is talking about the new Google's browser, coined Chrome. and the idea of launching a &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/index.html"&gt;comic book&lt;/a&gt; to explain the advantages of Chrome a day before the launch is absolutely brilliant, and surely must be responsible for some of the hype generated along.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since there is no Mac version available yet, I still haven't try it, but after reading some posts today, I'm glad I haven't:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Ryan Narraine, a security evangelist at Kaspersky Lab, &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1843"&gt;found out&lt;/a&gt; that Chrome has inherited a serious security flaw from the old version of &lt;a href="http://webkit.org"&gt;WebKit&lt;/a&gt; is based on: by combining a flaw in WebKit with a known Java bug, is possible to an attacker to trick Windows users into launching a Java file in one's computer. Try this &lt;a href="http://raffon.net/research/google/chrome/carpet.html"&gt;demo&lt;/a&gt; to see the bug working (don't worry, it's only a proof of concept, the Java application that will be installed in your Windows computer will do no harm);&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;The other issue has to do with &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/eula.html"&gt;Chrome Terms of Service&lt;/a&gt;, which I believe will be changed in a near future, since point 11.1 states, and I quote, "&lt;i&gt;By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services&lt;/i&gt;". In my opinion, this make sense when we are talking of services like YouTube and such, but in this case we are talking about a browser, so, by accepting this term, I would be allowing Google to own any content that I would access through the Chrome browser, which is pretty abusive, don't you think?&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In summary, I will wait for the version 1.1 of the browser, and for a change in the Terms of Service before trying it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:7368d0c0-ad5c-4a2f-9529-aee2ac03011b</guid>
      <author>bordalix</author>
      <link>http://www.joaobordalo.com/articles/2008/09/03/chrome-some-bad-news</link>
      <category>google</category>
      <category>chrome</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

