<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>The place João Bordalo calls home: Tag copyright</title>
    <link>http://www.joaobordalo.com/articles_controller.rb/tag?tag=copyright</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Simplicity, Usability, Productivity, Code, Design, Business and more</description>
    <item>
      <title>The web rich media patent</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone is talking about the patent granted by the US Patent Office to &lt;a href="http://balthaser.com/"&gt;Balthaser&lt;/a&gt;, covering "methods, systems and processes for the design and creation of rich-media applications via the Internet." A lot of FUD is going on, with people saying that AJAX, Java and even Flash will need to be licensed in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, I decided to read the &lt;a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=7,000,180.WKU.&amp;OS=PN/7,000,180&amp;RS=PN/7,000,180"&gt;patent&lt;/a&gt;, and it's not that bad: the usage of rich-media applications is not covered under this patent. Instead, what Balthaser is patenting is a hosted application which enables normal people to build rich-media websites (or applications), there is, a rich-media website, that previously demanded designers, flash programmers and coders, can now be accomplished by anyone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, Balthaser is defending is own tool, &lt;a href="http://balthaser.com/"&gt;pro:FX&lt;/a&gt;. The thing is, isn't this patent to broad? What is the definition of "rich-media application"?&lt;p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the same day, Google launched is new service, &lt;a href="http://pages.google.com/"&gt;Page Creator&lt;/a&gt;, a website that enables you to create your own website, with the easiness and simplicity we know from Google. And after a &lt;a href="http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/02/make_your_own_sites_with_googl.html"&gt;peek&lt;/a&gt; to the Page Creator interface, my first question was: "Is this under the Balthaser patent?". 

&lt;p&gt;If is considered that Google (and others) must license this kind of technology to Balthaser, than we have just created a strong break on innovation, and I strongly believe that is not the objective of patents. They exist to encourage innovation, by protecting intellectual property, not for some guy to decide that put a &lt;a href="http://www.macromedia.com/software/dreamweaver/"&gt;Dreamweaver&lt;/a&gt; on the web is innovation. That was too damn obvious to be considered as an inventive idea.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just hope &lt;a  href="http://patft.uspto.gov/"&gt;someone&lt;/a&gt; get is senses, meanwhile, I'm happy to live in Europe.&lt;/p&gt;  </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:741e850d-f287-41b6-84b7-4b139a25ffe1</guid>
      <author>bordalix</author>
      <link>http://www.joaobordalo.com/articles/2006/02/23/the-web-rich-media-patent</link>
      <category>copyright</category>
      <category>google</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

